Daniil Sarksian vs Karol Filar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Daniil Sarksian has a slight edge over Karol Filar in second serve performance, winning 43.12% of points compared to Filar's 40.92%.
• On returns of the opponent's second serve, Karol Filar outperforms Daniil Sarksian, winning 46.52% of points to Sarksian's 45.85%.
• First serve return stats reveal a small advantage for Karol Filar, claiming 29.22% of points versus Daniil Sarksian's 27.81%.
• Under pressure, Karol Filar demonstrates better breakpoint-saving abilities, saving 50.16% compared to Daniil Sarksian's 48.68%.
• Karol Filar has a strong overall match win rate over the past year at 65.91%, notably higher than Daniil Sarksian's 35.00%.
• Considering surface preference, both players have unique strengths; however, Filar excels on Hard courts with a 50.00% win rate.
• When assessing player levels, Karol Filar has been more successful, especially in $10K ITF events, with a win rate of 67.44%.
• Despite Filar regularly facing higher-ranked opponents (average rank 420.5) compared to Sarksian (average rank 511.1), he maintains superior performance.
• In deciding sets, Karol Filar again has the advantage, securing 44% of such sets compared to Sarksian's 38% over the past 12 months.
• Karol Filar's higher breakpoint conversion rate of 43.51% reveals greater efficiency than Daniil Sarksian's 36.36% of such opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (November 27, 2025, UTC):

In analyzing the head-to-head statistics, it's evident that both players bring distinct strengths to the upcoming match. Daniil Sarksian shows a marginal edge in second serve performance, which is often a significant statistic when predicting match outcomes. However, Karol Filar consistently demonstrates superior return game skills, especially on first serves.

Filar's ability to convert breakpoints effectively and to save them under pressure gives him an additional advantage. Further, when examining overall performance over the past year, Filar's win rate is substantially higher, indicating more reliable form and consistency.

The playing surface will not provide a marked advantage to either player, but given Filar's historic success on Hard courts, he may find himself more comfortable. Also, considering the higher level of competition Filar has faced and succeeded against, his experience and performance in high-pressure situations should set him apart.

In conclusion, although both players have their strengths, Karol Filar is the likely winner for this match due to his overall consistent performance, superior return statistics, and higher success rates in both breakpoint and deciding set situations.